Coronavirus (COVID-19)

PACE requirements to secure an AA

AA provision by organised schemes

Joint Interim Interview Protocol (JIIP) 


PACE requirements to secure an AA

PACE and its Codes of Practice have not been amended during the Covid-19 pandemic. Police officers are required to secure the involvement of an AA for the same processes and procedures as prior to the pandemic. This includes the need to secure the attendance of an AA (as opposed to a remote / live link) for several procedures, including interviews.

AA provision by organised schemes

AA schemes have continued to attend police custody throughout Covid-19 pandemic. This is in line with NAAN guidance, which states that AAs should continue to attend custody, subject to:

  1. The detention being necessary
  2. Suitable PPE being available in line with the NPCC PPE guidance
  3. The custody suite is being run in line with national health and safety / PPE guidance.  

Joint Interim Interview Protocol (JIIP) 

The JIIP was originally agreed in March 2020 between the Crown Prosecution Service, National Police Chiefs' Council, The Law Society, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association and London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association. It was intended as short-term emergency guidance to assist investigators and prosecutors in deciding whether suspects should be interviewed as part of a police investigation during the coronavirus pandemic. It also encourages the use of remote advice for suspects - a practice that is not covered by the PACE Act or Codes of Practice. 

On the publication of the JIIP, NAAN encouraged the signatories to consider the lack of safeguards for children and vulnerable adult suspects. Version 2 of the JIIP introduced safeguards, including the need for police to carry out individual assessments of suitability and to secure the consent of the AA. However, these safeguards were not sufficiently effective in preventing disadvantage to suspects (and thereby risks to the reliability of evidence). The signatories agreed and, from 17 May 2021, JIIP version 3 excluded all children and vulnerable people from remote legal representation.  This simplified the process for AAs, suspects and police.

JIIP version 4 (October 2021) introduced a presumption of in-person legal advice for all suspects, with four exceptions for when remote representation could be used. However, it also applied these exceptions to children and vulnerable adults. This conflicts with NAAN's understanding of the appropriate adult's duties and the suspect's rights in law. 

After careful consideration, NAAN had concluded that we are uanble to advise AAs to agree to take part in interviews in which legal representation is to be provided remotely. However, AAs should continue to attend police custody in all cases. For further guidance, rationale and resources, please see the links below.

 

Download Free Designs http://bigtheme.net/ Free Websites Templates

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

View Privacy Policy

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.

You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.